At the end of the night, you dance with the person who brought you to the dance. Even at a time of unparalleled mudslinging in Texas politics, this is one rule of etiquette virtually every politician follows.
This is why it makes sense that Rick Perry and Chris Bell and Carol Strayhorn have spent much of the campaign bickering over whose financial backers are more detestable. Is it more dangerous to have one trial lawyer backing a candidate, as is the case with Chris Bell, or a whole platoon of them? Who’s worse, ethically speaking, the guy who’s major investors are profiting from the Trans-Texas corridor he helped implement, or the guy whose entire candidacy is predicated on big money from one source?
The answer, of course, is that we shouldn’t have to choose between these sort of candidates and these sort of backers. We don’t want any special interests purchasing our leaders – the idea that our major party candidates (and Grandma) think we should vote for them because the other guy’s buyers are worse is laughable. When Chris Bell (correctly) calls Rick Perry a hypocrite for attacking the man propping up the Bell campaign, he ignores the fact that Rick Perry can be hypocrite without Chris Bell being much better.
Kinky Friedman’s the only candidate in this race who’s drawn the vast majority of his support from average citizens. And he’s the only candidate, once the election’s over and he’s elected Governor, who’ll be loyal to those citizens come dancin’ time.